On the other hand, Spider-Man going gritty doesn’t usually work out. On one hand, going that route with Spider-Man made sense, as it would certainly be different from the bright and goofy Raimi movies. This was also a time when The Dark Knight Trilogy was finishing up and its success was causing studios to try and make superhero movies dark and grounded. Even if they’re good, they’re following up something so popular, and doing it so soon, that there will inevitably be built-in hate for it. It’s the same situation that gave us the animated series The Batman and Rise of the TMNT. Sony had to create a movie that was still Spider-Man, but different enough to not be the previous Spider-Man. Five years after we saw a defining take on the hero. A reboot five years after his last adventure. Fine, Sony more or less announced, they would have the reboot ready for summer 2012. Hence, the studo made it clear that Spider-Man was getting a reboot in the same week Raimi announced he would not be able to get Spider-Man 4 into theaters by 2011. Not to mention that they still had to crank out Spider-Man movies every few years to keep the film rights. Raimi was done, but money showed that people still wanted motion pictures of Spider-Man. Sam Raimi called it quits early in production on Spider-Man 4 and none of the other main actors cared to stick around either. Is it better than we remember? Is it worth revisiting for another installment, perhaps as part of the Venomverse? That supporting role makes one wonder about the Amazing Spider-Man series. Well, not as much as Willem Dafoe dropping the crispest spinebusters you’ve ever seen, but Garfield was easily the highlight of the three Spider-Men. When Spider-Man: No Way Home, the third solo installment for Tom Holland’s MCU Spider-Man, came to theaters and brought in heroes and villains from the previous films, it was Andrew Garfield’s performance as the Peter Parker of the Webb universe that had people talking. The Marc Webb era of cinematic Spider-Man is thus a doomed duology sandwiched in-between the iconic Raimi Trilogy and the one who gets to hang out in the world-conquering superhero film franchise. Next thing you know, there’s a Spider-Man in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and he has his own Disneyland ride. The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was a mess and while it made money, it didn’t make the kind of money Sony wanted and all the big plans for a sequel and beyond fizzled. The genesis of the first movie-where we would watch another Peter Parker origin story-was already deemed a bad idea among many fans when it was announced, and Sony didn’t change any minds over the next few years. Based on a comic book series, DeHaan stars as Major Valerian, one of the special operatives who embarks on a mission to save Alpha, a metropolis that’s home to species from a thousand planets.The Amazing Spider-Man movies were practically born to fail. The cast also includes Cara Delevingne, Rihanna, Clive Owen, and Ethan Hawke. Not long after, DeHaan also landed the lead role in Luc Besson’s adventure fantasy Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. As we started developing The Cure, I couldn't get him out of my head for the role.” “I wanted to put him in my next movie and find a part for him. “I've just always been a fan of his and I saw him in a small part in A Place Beyond the Pines, and was immediately, ‘Who's that?’” Verbinski told Collider. And as it turns out, it was one of DeHaan’s pre-Spider-Man performances that caught Verbinski’s attention. Among them is Gore Verbinski’s fantasy horror A Cure For Wellness, which also stars Jason Isaacs and Mia Goth. Soon after wrapping up on The Amazing Spider-Man 2, DeHaan moved on to several other film projects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |